Your Comments

"I'm afraid the last laugh will be on the purchasers of the new condominium property. Don't they know it's right on a chemical dump? I wouldn't live there for free. I feel sorry for anyone that gets duped into buying this property."
- Jerry Dolittle

"I was amazed to learn that our Mayor pro tem was the originating force behind the destruction of the Ice House. What kind of a town is this?"
- Bill Mahew

"I can't believe it! I have lived here in Wilmington since I was 5, and barely know anything about the many historical sites in this area. The only one’s I’ve ever been familiar with are the Bellamy Mansion, the Burgwin-Wright House, along with some of the other most popular sites. I just recently went down town for the Azalea festival and happened to walk towards the area where the Ice House used to be. I didn’t know much about the Ice House until I got to the location where a sign had been posted with some historical information about the building. In all actuality, I was absolutely depressed that I couldn’t view the building. As embarrassing as it is for me to say this, when I heard the Ice House was going to be torn down, I didn’t really care because I’d never been inside it or had seen it or knew anything about it. I have also just recently heard of the Iron Works only due to the fact that it is also being threatened by developers. My point is that these buildings are not being made public. If people don’t know about them, then how are they supposed to really appreciate them? Honestly, I am truly appalled that this horrible man is thinking about making Condos over a historical building. I love Wilmington, and I love its history; but I don’t love that it’s being taken for granted. I think that if more people knew about these buildings through some type of media (be it the news or the newspaper) and not when they’re only made known because they’re about to be torn down, then I think more people will see how important these are to the community. All I have to say is thank you very much for putting a bulletin in the Star-news. It will definitely get a lot of attention."
- Jennifer Raines

"The HPC should either be given more legal power or should be abolished. A present it is like a gun half-cocked, half-loaded, dangerous for everybody on both sides of it. It promises to be able to save our buildings, but it can't, it doesn't have enough ammo. Developers can always have a building condemned and the HPC can't stop them. At the heart of all this controversy is a poorly constructed preservation system. That makes the HPC treacherous company, an untrustworthy guardian of our historic treasures. "
- Ronald Byrd

"Thank you for fighting to save historic downtown! Please let me know how I can help. The "quick flip" mentality to turn a buck is all the rage in real estate these days, but when that short-term thinking drives our elected representatives and appointed officials' decisions, we the people need to call them out. For example, why would anyone attend a convention in a downtown Wilmington devoid of its historic charm? It's pretty clear the City Council's agenda is motivated by handing out subsidies and privileges to a few insiders, with little concern for long-term consequences. "
- Best Regards, Brian Berger

"hi ... read the interview with the unknown commissioner...since he is no longer on the HPC, it would make the article and comments more believable if the person will have the courage to list his/her name. It is difficult to believe someone is really serious or expect people to believe their comments when they are afraid to let someone know who they are. There is really no retaliation out there against someone who makes the comments..so, why the fear? thanks.."
- Ron Wilson

"I think we should have a little sympathy for our HPC people. Some of them are sincerely trying to do a good job. Some of them may be only dragged down by the others. It is, of course, possible that all of them were sincerely trying to save the building from Lashley. It is not their fault he is (or was) an ex-HPC person. There will always be bad eggs and we can't make everybody responsible. It might well be a bad judgement call on their part to cater to a "blackmailer" as you call him, in that it will bring other blackmailers downtown who will follow of his ill-advised precedent. If developers start removing the roofs off our historic buildings and adding more floors onto them, that would be a disaster! Whether well-intended or not, the ultimate responsibility will lie with the HPC for letting that happen."
- Richard Edger

"My husband was a commissioner for several years and took his job very seriously indeed. He and I together inspected every project up for approval. He tried his best to be a fair, decent, un-biased and objective commissioner. We both wanted only what was best for our adopted city. He died last year. I am glad he never saw this web site. It would have hurt him very deeply. Who are you? I'd like your names to be on your site. Let's see all you advocates show some backbone and publish your names."
- Joan Brooks

"About the astounding Iron Works condominiums . . . It seems impossible that such a thing could be given a permit but it was. The only conclusion we can draw is that something has gone deeply wrong with our Historic Preservation system. The HPC is no longer on the same page as the rest of us in Wilmington, NC."
- Michael L. Parker

"The growing feeling is that the HPC has outlived its usefulness to the community. This website confirms it."
- Tim Dvorak

"Weak when confronted with developer dollars, and overbearing to the law-abiding citizen, the Historic Preservation Commission proves itself irrelevant and meaningless in dealing with serious issues in downtown Wilmington."
- Tanith Tyrr

"The Historic Preservation Commission's job is to protect the public's historic markers from people who destroy them. Clearly, when the ex-commissioners themselves are the ones doing the destroying, the system has broken down. Perhaps it is time to destroy the Historic Preservation Commission! We should start over, try something else. It might be good for Wilmington to get its head out of the sand and model itself on other cities where these same enemies have already raised their heads and been dealt with appropriately."
- Ray Queen.

"The allegations that the Historic Preservation Commission might have some corrupt players comes as no surprise to me. What is surprising is that it has taken people so long to realize it."
- Elsie Law

"One shrinks with horror to learn that a former Historic Preservation Commissioner is doing what Donn Lashley is now planning! Somehow one expects it of a Toconis or one of the others, but from a commissioner, this is disgraceful!"
- Received anonymously

"We rely on the Historic Preservation Commission to protect us from men like Lashley, but to think that he himself was a commissioner- how could we expect such a system to work?"
- Lisa Murdaw

"I think you people are stupid. What we need these old buildings for anyway?! Knock 'em all down, I say! Let's modernize the city. I for one would like to see a strip club downtown, and a rodeo bar."
- Eddie Miles

"Mr. Lashley has done a good job restoring the old Roudabush building, but I guess he thinks it's two for one. Restoring one old building does not give him license to knock down another. If every one of the good people in Wilmington thought that way then the entire Historic District would already be laid to waste."
- Terry Hunnicutt

"I think the attempts to embarrass these people are wrong headed - it will accomplish little. They are on a different level . . . a level of hypocrisy where shame doesn't reach them . . . They can always lie to themselves, lie their way past anything you put across. True hypocrites always can. They are simply the kind of people who will do anything to get rich. Whether defacing a historic building or destroying a rain forest, if there is a hole in the system they will find it."
- Received anonymously

"Who are you? Your anonimity takes a little gas out of your tank. I support your feelings, your site is impressive. "
- John Bankson

Editor's note:

Several of the letters we have received complain of the so-called "anonymity" of the PAHD supporters, but this has no basis in fact. PAHD makes no secret of its supporters, and the majority of their names are listed on the comments page under their remarks. These can be contacted directly through this site. Only three supporters requested his/her name be withheld. Two are unknown to us (see comments), and while the other is known (the former HPC member who granted us the interview) we respect every supporter's request for privacy.

Critics of the site seem to follow the politician's habit of avoiding the issues at hand. They exhaust a great deal of verbiage regaling us with their own former accomplishments, followed by their personal endorsement of the public figures involved in the controversy, etc.,. None so far have even mentioned the present source of the problem, that yet another of Wilmington's great historic landmarks is being lost to unnecessary development; and that some of our former Historic Preservation Commissioners are at the end of the money trail.

The PAHD is about preserving historic downtown. It is not an honorarium citing the past accomplishments of those who, for reasons obviously traceable to money, now wish to destroy it. Simply, it exposes those who destroy historic buildings. It is not interested in the personal lives of the destroyers, what good church goers they may be, how much they give to charity, or how much they have already done for historic preservation, etc.,. Because one person may have preserved one or more historic buildings in his life does not give that person the right to destroy other historic buildings in trade. PAHD is about the intersection of public figures with present day issues of considerable concern to Wilmingtonians. It reveals the abuses of positions of power.

Contact us to leave your own comments on the site
Read more comments published in the Wilmington Star-News

Previous Site Home Next